Thursday, December 23, 2010

"Only" 126 Muslim terrorists indicted in the U.S., in the past 2 Years

"Only" 126 Muslim terrorists indicted in the U.S., in the past 2 Years
Attorney General Eric Holder's Blunt Warning on Terror Attacks ... Dec 21, 2010 ... In the last 24 months, Holder said, 126 people have been indicted on terrorist- related charges, Fifty of those people are American citizens

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/attorney-general-eric-holders-blunt-warning-terror-attacks/story?id=12444727


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Labels: ,

posted by Free Israel @ 12:30 PM 0 comments

Tuesday, January 29, 2008

Canada Abandons UN Racism Conference [which is hijacked by Arab racism and Islamic bigotry 'lobby']

Canada Abandons UN Racism Conference [which is hijacked by Arab racism & Islamic bigotry 'lobby']

OTTAWA (AP) — Canada has withdrawn its support for a U.N. anti-racism conference scheduled to take place in South Africa next year after deeming it to be anti-Israel, a government official said Wednesday.

The so-called Durban II conference "has gone completely off the rails" and Canada wants no part of it, said Jason Kenney, Canada's secretary of state for multiculturalism and Canadian identity.

"We'll attend any conference that is opposed to racism and intolerance, not those that actually promote racism and intolerance," he said.

Kenney said that during the 2001 World Conference Against Racism in Durban, Arab and Muslim countries criticized Israel, prompting Israel and the United States to walk out in protest. But he added that Canada remained to speak up for Israel.

The U.N. declined to comment directly on Canada pulling out of the conference, but U.N. spokeswoman Marie Okabe said "racism is too important an issue for member states not to work out their differences."

Kenney said his government was left with no choice but to abandon the process, expressing displeasure with Libya elected to chair the gathering, Cuba appointed vice-chair, and Iran named to the organizing committee.

"This (Iran) is a country whose government has publicly expressed its desire to eliminate the only Jewish country in the world," he said.
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hzBJ3YmTLoCiEIisMtb-XUOipaEAD8UBSVPG2

----

Canada Calls UN Led Anti-Racism Conference a ‘Gong Show’ of Hatred ...
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/terry-trippany/2008/01/28/canada-calls
-u-n-led-anti-racism-conference-gong-show-hatred-bigotry
The United Nations held its first World Conference Against Racism in Durban way back in 2001. That conference was marred by anti-Semitic bigotry

----

Exposing the anti-Semitism of Durban II

By PAUL SCHNEIDEREIT
Tue. Jan 29 - 4:47 AM
HYPOCRISY, the popular 19th-century American journalist and satirist Ambrose Bierce once observed, could be defined as "prejudice with a halo."

As false halos go, there are few bigger – or shinier, in that cheap, glittery way – than the one now swaying precariously over the United Nations’ so-called Human Rights Council. Since the council was formed as part of former secretary-general Kofi Annan’s "UN reform" a few years back, the world’s supposed watchdog for violations of human rights has been able to officially condemn just one country for abuses of those rights: Israel.

If that sounds familiar – you’re right, it is. The council’s disgraced predecessor, the equally misnamed UN human rights commission, also chose to devote itself, one might say religiously, to Israel’s alleged infractions of human rights in its interminable conflict with the Palestinians.

Now, these human rights bodies have every right to investigate Israel’s behaviour and, when appropriate, rebuke the Jewish state for actions going beyond being reasonable measures of self-defence. But to focus almost exclusively on Israel, while ignoring – or downplaying the seriousness of – all other incidents elsewhere in the world, including what’s often brutal suppression of people’s human rights, is utterly wrong.

Of course, the fact that the countries which sat as members of the old commission, as well as the nations making up the new council, have often been the very countries that have compiled the most disgraceful human rights records means we are discussing hypocrisy being practised at a very high level (to paraphrase Bierce, where the angels sing).

Which brings us to the news the UN’s Human Rights Council is now busy planning a second UN conference on racism in 2009, to be held, as the first one was in 2001, in Durban, South Africa. Who’s in charge of the planning? Two countries with among the most appalling human rights records on the planet: Libya and Iran.

For anyone who’s forgotten what happened in Durban six-and-a-half years ago, that so-called conference on ending racism in the world witnessed demonstrations of virulent anti-Semitism directed against both Israel specifically and Jews in general. One example of many: Copies of the so-called Protocols of the Elders of Zion, a well-documented forgery (most likely created by the Russian czar’s police) that purports to be the secret plans for a Jewish world takeover, were openly sold within the conference area.

Equally repulsive was the canard – put forward forcefully in Durban in 2001 – that Western nations had a responsibility to pay hefty reparations to Africa to atone for their role in the transatlantic slavery trade. That, however, ignores several facts.

Some Africans themselves were complicit in that trade. Slavery itself (though the transatlantic trade was ended by the British in the early 19th century) was not outlawed in a number of African states until the latter part of the 20th century (Mauritania, for example, banned slavery in 1981 but only criminalized it in 2007). Experts believe today that some 27 million people worldwide (many in African countries, such as Niger) are in some form of human bondage. Saudi Arabia, where black slaves were sold well into the 20th century, only outlawed slavery in 1962.

The U.S. and Israeli delegations, to their credit, walked out of the Durban conference in disgust midway through; Canada, though critical of what transpired, stayed.

With Libya and Iran at the helm for Durban II, we know what to expect – more anti-Semitism, this time more explicitly ingrained in the conference’s agenda. In December, 41 countries in the UN General Assembly, including Canada, voted against $6.8 million US in funding for the conference, to protest the anti-Semitic themes emerging in planning for the event. The measure, backed by Arab countries and supporters, however, easily passed. So last week, Canada exercised some true international moral leadership, becoming the first nation in the world to announce it would not attend the conference.

The government’s secretary of state for multiculturalism, Jason Kenney, told reporters Canada wanted no part of a Durban conference that would promote, not combat, racism.

Good for the Tories. We should refuse to take part in this sham. That so many in the world continue to promote hatred against Jews is despicable. To do so under the banner of the UN, founded to promote world peace, and the auspices of that body’s "human rights" council, is Orwellian.

Hopefully, Canada will soon be joined by other countries which honestly value human rights, leaving the cesspool that will be Durban II to those with tarnished halos and no sense of shame.

http://thechronicleherald.ca/Columnists/1034823.html

___________


Racists cry racism at U.N. conference At the Durban debacle, racists cried racism and anti-Semites paraded their ... If Israel is running an apartheid/racist state, it's doing a damned shoddy job. ... http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=24401

There They Go Again, Those Arab Racists ... when it comes to Israel, why not on the African ... Israel, where 7th century Arab imperialist invaders and 20th century Arab ... Arab racism marches on... http://www.michnews.com/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi/124/4241

muslim racism ... and Arab nations and their sympathizers, has accused Israel of racism, but the ... of Islamic and Arab states and other anti-Israel forces, and whose conclusions ... http://www.truthandgrace.com/muslimracism.htm

F L A M E : Racism in the Islamic World: How can peace prevail in the ... ... for decades to terminate the increasingly violent Arab-Israeli conflict. ... and Arab nations and their
sympathizers, has accused Israel of racism, but the ... http://www.factsandlogic.org/ad_94.html

"Terrorism and Racism: The Aftermath of Durban," by Anne F. Bayefsky ... Arab Reactions to September 11 / Fomenting the Battle Against Israel / Searching ... Minister of the United Arab Emirates, said "Israel can't be a member of ... http://www.jcpa.org/jl/vp468.htm

Reality Check On Racism ... United Nations Conference Against Racism, Israel is being singled out as ... The Arab countries continuously provoked Israel and brought about each war and ... http://www.gamla.org.il/english/article/2001/sept/tal.htm

The Arab racism of playing Israelis' fear of Arab terror as "racism ... http://www.danielpipes.org/comments/67487

_________________________

There you go, a racist "anti racism" conference headed by: Libya - another Arab racist oppression and totalitarian state with OIL, Iran, another Islamic totalitarian fascist radical Islamic state that persecutes all, especially its minorities - with OIL.
Bent on not giving Israel any right to exist and to promote the "logic" & justification for genocide, if that's not the epitome of RACISM, What is?



-

Labels: , , , , , , ,

posted by Free Israel @ 7:40 AM 0 comments

Tuesday, November 06, 2007

Schmoozing with Terrorists

http://shop.wnd.com/store/item.asp?ITEM_ID=2156
Schmoozing with Terrorists (autographed)
By Aaron Klein, Jerusalem Bureau Chief for WorldNetDaily.com. SPECIAL: For a limited time, all copies of "Schmoozing with Terrorists" will be autographed by Aaron Klein! Autographed books are available ONLY from Shop.WND. Order your autographed book today at the fantastic sale price of $19.95! In 'Schmoozing with Terrorists,' Aaron Klein obtains unprecedented access to bring readers into the vipers den of some of the most dangerous terrorist organizations in the world, traveling into hazardous terrorist zones and talking directly to the militants themselves about some of the most pressing issues today.Klein, a Jewish reporter, confronts terrorists whose stated goal is the annihilation of the United States and Israel, and narrates his interviews from the unique perspective of a Jew meeting with his enemy.Among other things, Klein schmoozes with the terrorists about who they want to see in the White House, their thoughts on big name American celebrities, what day-to-day life would be like if the global jihad took over the U.S., and why terrorists kill and maim.This book affords readers the unique opportunity to understand how the terrorists think and why they believe they are in a war to the finish…ours!

Among the highlights…

  • Madonna, Britney Spears stoned to death? What the U.S. would be like under sharia law.

  • Why is Hillary Clinton the jihadists choice for president?

  • Terrorists dish on anti-war celebrities, US radio hosts, politicians

  • A shocking expose on how YOUR tax dollars fund terrorism.

  • Bibles used as toilet paper? Synagogues as rocket launching zones? Meet the leaders of the most notorious holy site desecrations in history.

  • A face-to-face meeting with a recruited Palestinian suicide bomber

  • The under-reporter story of Christian persecution in the Middle East as told by the victims and antagonists.





    • Technorati -


    Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

    posted by Free Israel @ 12:58 PM 0 comments

    Sunday, September 09, 2007

    The Arab Lobby Controls US Media and Foreign Policy

    The Arab Lobby Controls US Media and Foreign Policy
    http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2007/09/arab-lobby-controls-us-media-abd.html

    Last year Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal donated $20 million each to Harvard and Georgetown Universities for programs in Islamic studies. The good prince also owns a chunk of Time/AOL the company who’s unit CNN employs the anti Israel Christiane Amanpour.In November of 2005, Fox’s O’Reilly showed live footage of the French Intifada as it raged in Paris. According to WorldNetDaily, Saudi billionaire Prince al-Waleed bin Talal, (aka Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Bin AbdulAziz AlSaud), who owns 5-6% of the Fox News Channel, personally called Rupert Murdoch and asked him to change the offensive (but accurate) caption: “Muslim Riots” to the less offensive (and less accurate) “Civil Riots.” Within thirty minutes, the Prince had his way.

    In December 2005, Prince Al-Waleed donated $20 million each to Harvard University and Georgetown University to finance Islamic studies. The gift to Georgetown, which set up the Prince Alwaleed Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding in his honor, was the university’s second-largest donation in history, and the gift to Harvard was among its 25 largest. Any idea of what the skew of thoses studies are.

    Prince Alwaleed bin Talal is the largest single stockholder in Time and Citibank he is a one man Arab Lobby. But you wont hear Messers Walt and Mearsheimer talk about him or any of the other Saudi investors who challenge our free speech and influence American foreign policy.




    What’s so nefarious about Jews exercising their right to speech?

    By Jeff Robbins

    September 7, 2007

    A crop of Israel’s critics — most prominently Jimmy Carter and now Stephen Walt and John Mearsheimer, the authors of “The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy” — have managed something of a feat: They express no concerns about the massive pro-Arab effort, funded in significant measure by foreign oil money, taking American Jews to task for participating in the American political process; meanwhile, they inoculate themselves against charges of anti-Jewish bias by pre-emptively predicting that “the Jewish lobby” will accuse them of it.

    Messrs. Walt and Mearsheimer, in particular, have been heralded by Israel’s critics for their “courage” in attacking American Jews, who have allegedly “strangled” criticism of Israel. Their case seems one part laughable, and one part eyebrow-raising.

    An anecdote from my own experience with the anti-Israel lobby may shed some light on the absurdity of the Walt-Mearsheimer offensive. Not long after Sept. 11, 2001, I received a call from a major defense contractor asking for a favor. I was serving as president of the Boston chapter of the World Affairs Council, a national organization that debates foreign policy, and the defense contractor was one of the Council’s principal sponsors.

    The Saudi Arabian government was sponsoring a national public relations campaign to cultivate American public opinion, and was sending Saudi emissaries around the country to make the case that Saudi Arabia was a tolerant, moderate nation worthy of American support. Would the Council organize a forum of Boston’s community leaders so that the Saudis could make their case?

    While this was patently no more than a Saudi lobbying effort, we organized the forum, and it was well-attended by precisely the slice of Boston’s political and corporate elite that the Saudis and their defense contractor benefactor had hoped for. The Saudis maintained that their Kingdom should be regarded as a promoter of Middle East peace, and that the abundant evidence that Saudi Arabia was in fact promoting a virulent brand of extremist Islam should be discounted.

    Saudi Arabia paid for the trip of its emissaries to Boston, for the Washington, D.C.-based public relations and lobbying company which organized the trip, and for the Boston public relations and lobbying company that handled the Boston part of the visit. And it drew upon the resources and relationships of the defense contractor, which sells hundreds of millions of dollars of military equipment to Saudi Arabia, to support and orchestrate its public relations effort.

    The billions in petrodollars Arab states spend in the U.S. for defense, construction, engineering and consulting contracts position them nicely to win friends in high places, and friends are what they have. That is true all over the world, is true in this country, and has been true for quite some time. As U.S. Secretary of State Cordell Hull noted 60 years ago, “The oil of Saudi Arabia constitutes one of the world’s great prizes.” His successor, Edward Stettinius, opposed the creation of a Jewish state in the Middle East, stating “It would seriously prejudice our ability to afford protection to American interests, economic and commercial . . . throughout the area.”

    The Saudis and their allies have not been shy about supplementing their considerable leverage in the U.S. by targeting expenditures to affect the debate over Middle East policy by funding think tanks, Middle East studies programs, advocacy groups, community centers and other institutions.

    To take one obvious example, just last year Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal donated $20 million each to Harvard and Georgetown Universities for programs in Islamic studies. Prince Alwaleed, chairman of a Riyadh-based conglomerate, is the fellow whose $10 million donation to the Twin Towers Fund following the Sept. 11 attacks was rejected by then-Mayor Rudolph Giuliani after the Saudi Prince suggested that the U.S. “re-examine its policies in the Middle East and adopt a more balanced stance toward the Palestinians.”

    Georgetown and Harvard had no apparent qualms about accepting Prince Alwaleed’s money. The director of Georgetown’s newly-renamed Prince Alwaleed bin Talal Center rejected any suggestion that the Saudi magnate was attempting to use Saudi oil wealth to influence American policy in the Middle East. “There is nothing wrong with [Prince Alwaleed] expressing his opinion on American foreign policy,” he said. “Clearly, it was done in a constructive way.”

    In other words, for those who accept the Arab line on the Israel-Arab conflict — namely, that it is the product of Israeli intransigence in some form or another — the increasing proliferation of Middle East-funded enterprises all across the country aimed at advancing the Arab view of the conflict constitute “nothing wrong.” Nor are those hewing to the anti-Israel line troubled by the way in which the massive Islamic bloc of nations, by dint both of their number and their economic leverage over the rest of the world, are able to guarantee an incessantly anti-Israel agenda at the United Nations and other international fora.

    Although the aggressive deployment of petrodollars and oil-based influence from foreign sources aimed at advancing a pro-Arab line constitutes “nothing wrong” as far as Israel’s critics are concerned, a new political fashion holds that there is something very wrong indeed about American Jews and other American backers of Israel expressing their support for Israel, and urging their political leaders to join them in that support.

    Our major newspapers and networks, with correspondents in Israel able to take advantage of an Israeli political system that is a free-for-all and an astonishingly vibrant and self-critical Israeli press, report daily on every twist and turn of the conflict and are very frequently critical of Israel. As for American campuses, most objective observers would have little difficulty concluding that far from being criticism-free, they are in fact dominated by critics of Israel. Clearly, as strangleholds on criticism go, whatever stranglehold the pro-Israel community has on debate in the U.S. is a very loose one indeed.

    If the charge that American Jews are able to stifle criticism of Israel is simply silly, the leveling of the charge that there is something nefarious about Jews urging support for the Jewish state raises questions about whether Messrs. Walt and Mearsheimer have descended into a certain ugliness. And the tactic of trying to neutralize those questions by loudly predicting that they will be asked, however clever a tactic it may be, does not neutralize them.

    It is apparently the authors’ position that, even in the face of the overwhelming leverage of an Arab world swimming in petrodollars, with a lock on the U.N. and an unlimited ability to pay for pro-Arab public relations, American Jews are obliged to stay silent. In essence, Messrs. Walt and Mearsheimer have repackaged the “the-Jews-run-the-country” stuff which has long been the bread and butter of anti-Semites.

    Messrs. Walt and Mearsheimer deny that they are anti-Semitic, and that is certainly good news. But where they are apparently content with foreign oil money being used to advance a pro-Arab position on the Middle East, but devote themselves to criticizing American Jews for lobbying their public officials in support of the Jewish state, one may legitimately wonder what phrase would apply. Surely, one’s denial that he is anti-Semitic, while welcome, is hardly dispositive; after all, the marked increase in anti-Semitism around the world is well-documented, and yet one rarely hears anyone actually announce that they are anti-Semitic, or that their views are anti-Semitic.

    But if anti-Semitism is too harsh a term, and if the word “bigoted” is also taken off the table, perhaps one can be forgiven for concluding that “anti-Jewish bias” fits the bill here. After all, where there is nothing wrong with foreign money from Arab countries advancing a pro-Arab agenda in Messrs. Walt’s and Mearsheimer’s world — but there is something very wrong with American citizens who are Jewish exercising their civic right to speak out on behalf of Israel and taking issue with the pro-Arab agenda — even the most vehement disclaimers of any bias against Jews lack a certain credibility.

    The potency of the Middle East-funded anti-Israel lobby around the world and in the U.S. is difficult to ignore. Yet, Messrs. Walt and Mearsheimer and others who adhere to an anti-Israel line ignore it. In and of itself, this is not surprising. When at the same time they portray American Jews’ efforts to make the case for Israel as morally suspect, however, they open themselves up to reasonable charges of something far more troublesome than mere hypocrisy, and that is anti-Jewish bias, by whatever name.

    Mr. Robbins, a U.S. Delegate to the U.N. Human Rights Commission during the Clinton administration, is an attorney at Mintz, Levin in Boston and represents David Project in the Islamic Society of Boston lawsuit.

    Global domination
    ]

    Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

    posted by Free Israel @ 7:32 AM 0 comments

    Thursday, March 15, 2007

    How much did the Islamic lobby pay Obama??? or How much does a pro-palestinian line cost?

    How much did the Islamic lobby pay Obama??? or How much does a pro-palestinian line cost?

    Let's make it clear, Arab Muslims' obsession with their 'palestinian brothers' was never about sympathy for them but about anti-Israel fascism.
    No wonder why they never had any interest in changing their situation (which is only due to 'palestinians' putting violence over economy, Jihad over progress), they're a useful tool ONLY when being still on the bottom.

    After the frustration by Arabs, Muslims on Obama's cold shoulder to the so called "palestinian". (Arab Obamania? El-Shorbagi thinks Arabs ought to pay attention to all presidential candidates http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2007/833/in2.htm), Something must have happend so that Brack Obama had to say something in sympathy for the self inflicted violence-obsessed death cult, knows as the 'palestinian people'.
    Obama: Palestinians Matter, Too
    http://news.yahoo.com/s/thenation/20070314/cm_thenation/1517517
    Iowa Democrat troubled by Obama statement on Palestinians http://www.belleville.com/mld/belleville/news/politics/16897403.htm


    The question is, How much did the Arab lobby, the Muslim lobby, the Arab-Oil lobby, or even the wahabbi lobby FINALLY pay the candidate.

    Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

    posted by Free Israel @ 5:08 PM 0 comments

    Saturday, March 10, 2007

    The Muslim Lobby

    http://www.commentarymagazine.com/contentions/index.php/schiffren/160


    The Muslim Lobby


    Lisa Schiffren - 2.16.2007 - 9:01AM



    Europe’s democracies have changed dramatically in recent years in response to Islamic population growth, growth fueled by immigration and birth rates substantially higher than local norms. Great Britain, France, Italy, and other nations have been forced to accommodate the needs and preferences of their Islamic citizens, often at the expense of the global conflict with radical Islam.


    Can it happen here? Suppose that the writer Mark Steyn is right to argue that “demographics are destiny.” What number of Muslims, agitating for their self-defined interests and agendas, would constitute a critical mass in the U.S.? At what point would American politicians feel compelled to take up their cause?


    The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the Muslim American Society (MAS), and the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) all worked overtime this past election cycle to create the impression that, in American politics, Muslims are now a force to be reckoned with. They were especially emphatic about the country’s growing Muslim population—some 8 million souls, in their oft-repeated estimates.


    So it comes as a useful corrective to read Patrick Poole’s “Numbers Don’t Lie” in this week’s Front Page Magazine. Poole cites two recent pieces (in IBD and the New York Sun) criticizing the methodology of the survey that produced the 8 million figure and citing new estimates drawn from survey work done at CUNY and the University of Chicago—estimates suggesting that there are, in fact, not 8 million Muslims in the U.S. but well under 3 million. Moreover, of these, only a minuscule 4,761 are dues-paying members of CAIR, which presents itself as the community’s authoritative voice.


    Whether CAIR or any of the others truly represents the sentiments of American Muslims is a question that political strategists might consider before pandering to their radical demands or overlooking their questionable (or worse) political associations, all amply documented over the years by observers like Daniel Pipes and Steven Emerson. But why be fooled by numbers? The readiness to inflate the size of their alleged constituency is only another tactic in a campaign of intimidation to which too many have already succumbed.



    _________________

    Technorati -

    Labels: , , , , , , ,

    posted by Free Israel @ 9:08 PM 0 comments

    Friday, September 29, 2006

    120 Years to first of Arabs' attacks on Jews in Israel "palestine" Area, Petach Tikva 1886

    How many times have you been told by propagandists that the 'middle east conflict all started in 1948'.

    As if up to then, all just got along, and that the Arabs were "peaceful".


    March - This Day in Jewish History - OU.ORG... attack on a Jewish settlement in Eretz Yisrael, 1886, against Petach Tikva. ... [March 25]. The discovery of the mutilated body of Andrei Yishinsky, ...
    http://www.ou.org/about/judaism/bhyom/mar.htm

    Glossary of Israeli Parties and Personalities - 1948-1981 Secretary of Petah Tikva Labor Council. Member of the National Committee of ... Abandoned following an Arab attack in 1929, it was restored in 1930. ...
    http://www.jcpa.org/art/knesset8.htm

    Alas, Why-Why, and Never Again
    1886-03-01 - First organized Arab attack on a Jewish settlement in Eretz Yisrael against Petach Tikva 1887-02-28 - Rumania excluded Jews from public service ...
    http://www.geocities.com/Buddychai/Religion/Alas.html

    A Timeline of Jewish History
    EVENT: The Petach Tikva agricultural Settlement is established in Eretz Yisroel ... EVENT: Arabs attack Jews in Eretz Yisroel in order to gain territory ...
    http://www.tumms.org/timeline_of_jewish_history.htm

    Jews beat off an Arab attack on Petach Tikvah http://www.strategypage.com/military_history_apr.asp

    Jewish History
    Arabs rioted, killing forty JEWS and wounding two hundred others. the riots soon spread To Tel Aviv, Petah Tikva, Kfar Saba, Hadera, and Rehovot. ...
    http://www.davidsconsultants.com/jewishhistory/history?letter=j

    Frumkin Newsletter 2002
    The first attack of Arabs on a Jewish settlement was in Petach Tikva in the year 1886; it was the attack in which Rabbi Arieh Leib Frumkin was very badly ...
    http://www.frumkin.org.il/newsl02.htm

    Yale Israel Journal - This was the case at al-Yahudiyya,17 where the first mass fellahin attack on a Jewish settlement, Petah Tikva, occurred in 1886. Fellahin from the village ...
    http://www.yaleisraeljournal.com/summ2006/krug.php

    ________________

    Related:
    http://lindasog.com/public/terrorvictims.htm A History of Terrorism in Israel

    Technorati -

    Labels: , , , , , , , ,

    posted by Free Israel @ 4:24 AM 0 comments