Tuesday, July 06, 2010

Mr. Obama, Too little, too late!


Mr. Obama, Too little too late!

If you saw (today, July-6-2010) Obama forcing himself to say that he is in good terms (I say “he,” as the US always is in that ‘special bond’, it's HE who has a problem) with Israel (albeit not these words exactly).

As if he doesn't know that people pick-up body language.

Compare his meeting w/ Netanyahu with his meeting with Arab leaders, oh boy, that's where he feels right at home, in fact, one of the most comfortable pictures of him, were exactly those, not so much being with his American countrymen, in one he even "annulled" himself entirely and bringing down US honor with it (bow to the Arab "king").

It says almost everything, WHERE a US president feels "at home." So now, at his low points when his popularity are "dangerously" scarce he's putting up a show?
Well, Mr. Obama, we won't forget that easy…


  • How you treated Mr. Netanyahu a few months ago, leaving him to dry in the sun because YOUR personal ego was offended at your Byden mission.
  • What on earth is your problem with houses in Jerusalem, since when was that historic Jewish capital the Arabs'? As if the M.E. depends on housing projects to Jewish returnees and not by arming, violence, hate-cult by Islamo-Arabs…
  • Your overall pro-Arabist approach, where your criticism of Palestinian-Arabs are only done after criticizing Israel as a fake balancing show.
  • Nor would we forget how you tried to spin the reporter asking you about your prejudgment 'blame Israel first'? at your "spontaneous" reaction after the Jihadi-Flotilla was interfered by the Israelis.
  • Above all, your most dangerous approach vis-a-vis Iran.


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Labels: ,

Sunday, June 15, 2008

Arab racism & Bush's admin. pro Arab-"Palestinian" foreign policy

Arab racism & Bush's admin. pro Arab-"Palestinian" foreign policy

The same Arab racism & Islamic bigotry that can't get itself to accept Jews' existance in the middle east, is the same Arab racism that has posted a personal racist anti-black cartoon in "Palestinian" Arab official media.

So now [June, 2008] Condoleeza Rice is buying 'Pallywood' that expanding Jewish neighborhoods are "obstacles"?

Maybe one should ask the admin. to start being really balanced in the middle east, and denounce as strongly any Arab "settlements" in E. Jerusalem?

Does anyone in this Bush admin. really believe that we'll buy one Arab's love for uttering such anti-Israel nonsense statements?

Name one Arab nation that became more "friendly" to the US, since Bush's pro 'Palestinian' policy, his powerful push to give the Arabs [who are mostly grandchildren of immigrants that started to call themselves as] "Palestinians" [in the 1960's] something they never had in history, a state.

______________


'Black spinster' label pinned on Condi Rice Palestinian media use racist terms including 'colored dark skin lady' ... A cartoon last week in the PA controlled Al Quds depicted Rice pregnant with a ...

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51298


Black Activists Condemn Racist Rice Cartoons in Palestinian Press
http://www.nationalcenter.org/P21PRAttacksRice806.html

CULTURE OF HATE–JIHAD RACISM ACROSS THE WORLD Culture of Hate A racism which denies the history and sufferings of its victims. … of the Jews in their ancestral homeland is interpreted as racism, …Arab racism consists of calling the Land of Israel, Arab land, whereas no Palestinian province, village, or town, including Jerusalem is mentioned either in the Koran or in any Arabic text before the end of the ninth century. On the contrary, these locations are mentioned in the Hebrew Bible, which represents the religious and historical heritage of the Jewish people. The Bible, which tells the history of this country, tells it in Hebrew, the language of the country, and not in Arabic. Palestinian racism consists of asserting that the whole history of Israel, biblical history, is Arab, Islamic, and Palestinian history. The kings and prophets of Israel were Arab, Palestinian, and Muslim kings and prophets, as were Jesus, his family, and the apostles. This Arabization and Islamization of the Bible thus robs not only the Jews but also the whole of Christianity of their history. New theologies of substitution are developed, transferring Israel’s heritage to Arab and Muslim Palestine. http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-yeor080202.asp



The role of bigotry in the Israel Arab conflict
http://www.peacefaq.com/bigotry.html



Arab racism must go!
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3478505,00.html


palestinian anti-semitism and racism.
http://www.pmw.org.il/Bulletins_Feb2007.htm


Israel has Arab judges, diplomats, and Members of the Knesset. Arabic is an official language of the state and 20% of the student body of Hebrew University is Arab. Full and equal status. Jews however still cannot get a visa to most Arab Muslim countries because of their religion. And in those Arab lands with remaining Jewish populations, Jews live under a secondary legal status called "dhimmitude". So exactly who is practicing apartheid Ms. Nastovski? And where is your moral voice on Arab racism?
http://www.canadafreepress.com/2006/wajsman060606.htm


Technorati -

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, June 04, 2008

Obama: Jerusalem must remain the undivided capital of Israel

Obama: Jerusalem must remain the undivided capital of Israel ...
"Jerusalem must remain the undivided capital of Israel," Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama said in his first speech to a major organization ...http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull&cid=1212041478725

Labels: , , ,

Thursday, May 22, 2008

US aid to Palestinians to total $550 mln (because they're our "friends" of the US or of the west as a whole?)

US aid to Palestinians to total $550 mln (because they're our "friends" of the US or of the west as a whole?)
Reuters ^ | May 21, 2008

US aid to Palestinians to total $550 mln - official WASHINGTON, May 21 (Reuters) - The US government will provide $550 million in direct financial support to the Palestinian Territories in 2008

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


Technorati -

Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, December 04, 2007

What Kind of War Are We Fighting, and Can We Win It? [ISLAMOFASCISM]

What Kind of War Are We Fighting, and Can We Win It?

A Symposium

IHC Abstract

In honor of Norman Podhoretz's recently published volume, World War IV: The Long Struggle Against Islamofascism, Commentary Magazine asked fifteen leading thinkers four questions pertaining to different scenarios in the book.


* Is it correct to consider the current war as WW IV?
* How much progress has been achieved post 9/11?
* Is the spread of democracy the best way to win the war against Islamofascism?
* Will the Bush Doctrine survive the 2008 elections and in what form?

The general response was that we are indeed engaged in a "world war". Democracy - or at least the ideals of freedom and liberty - may need to be nourished after a military victory. There are mixed opinions on America’s progress post 9/11; and finally the Bush Doctrine may or may not survive the elections - but is probably the best chance that America possesses.

The IHC recommends that you read this article in full.


Source: Commentary, November 2007

www.commentarymagazine.com/viewarticle.cfm?id=10959



Technorati -

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Arab lobby power - More Arabist anti Israel US foreign policy India abandons (Israeli) spy satellite launch under US pressure

Arab lobby power - More Arabist anti Israel US foreign policy - India abandons (Israeli) spy satellite launch under US pressure

India abandons (Israeli) spy satellite launch under US pressure

Daily News & Analysis,India ^ December 03, 2007 Sanjay Singh/Josy Joseph

India abandons spy satellite launch under US pressure
Sanjay Singh/Josy Joseph
Monday, December 03, 2007
TechSAR was to be launched with Israeli help last month
NEW DELHI: India’s strategic space-based surveillance (SBS) programme has suffered a huge setback.
Following last-minute US pressure, the launch of an Indo-Israeli spy satellite with synthetic aperture radar (SAR) was aborted literally at the launch pad stage.
Images from the satellite, with sub-metre picture resolution, would have significantly boosted India’s intelligence-gathering abilities. The satellite is capable of obtaining sharp images of civilian construction activities, including nuclear plants, that may have a strategic bearing. It can also scan cloud-covered mountain peaks. Lack of this capability enabled Pakistan-backed militants and army regulars to entrench themselves on the heights of Kargil, necessitating a huge armed response with many casualties.
If the SAR satellite had been launched on schedule, it would have been a first for both Israel and India. This is the second strategic programme to have received a setback after American intervention in recent times. Earlier, India curtailed the range of its missiles under development to 5,000 km under US pressure. It has advised military scientists not to think of developing a full-fledged inter-continental ballistic missile above 800 km range.
When DNA contacted a senior official involved in India’s strategic engagements with Israel, he insisted that the satellite launch, slated for end October or early November, was aborted because of “technical glitches”. He added: “Our decision to abort the launch at the last minute was not guided by any American pressure.”
However, at least three sources privy to the entire programme confirmed that the launch of TechSAR, mounted on a PSLV (Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle), was aborted after American intervention. TechSAR is technically an Israeli satellite being launched by the Indian Space Research Organisation (Isro) for a fee, but the imagery captured by it would have been available to Indian intelligence. Most importantly, this was to be the first in a series of spy satellites India was to launch with Israeli collaboration.
The need for satellites with SAR technology was felt very strongly after Kargil, when Indian agencies were caught napping as Pakistani intruders entered Indian peaks and set up bases. The images, available then from the Indian Remote Sensing (IRS) satellites and spy planes, were hazy and did not reveal any ground level movement – an intelligence failure which proved critical.
The proposal for cutting-edge space-based intelligence gathering was then put on the fast-track and made possible through strategic cooperation with Israel. The Jewish state is one of the rare few in the world with SAR technology and was also working on TechSAR. The microwaves sent from SAR can penetrate cloudy areas like Kargil and garner images. When these images are processed using advanced software, they can produce very sharp photographs even if there is cloud cover or dust storm.
The satellite was to be the first of three produced exclusively by or in partnership with Israel for meeting India’s intelligence requirements.
Sources say that TechSAR, weighing 260 kg, had arrived in India a few months ago. It was moved to the Satish Dhawan Space Centre, Sriharikota, for launch. A dependable source told DNA that the satellite was “mounted” on the PSLV when the American pressure came. “We had to literally dismantle it,” he said.
The countdown to a satellite launch begins three months before it is fired into orbit. A senior official in Delhi told DNA that India is “presently dependent on other countries for sub-metre resolution pictures. That is our handicap. We firmly believe that we must have our own system in place.”
“We have planned three satellites for now. We hope to have even more. Having more than one such satellite in orbit would reduce revisit time (when a satellite is orbiting) and we would have more data to make an analysis. This would give pictures of less than a metre’s resolution of rail lines, new roads, new services, and any civilian construction activity that could be of a nuclear nature in neighbouring countries,” another official said.



http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?newsid=1136837
___________


Report: US halted launch of Israeli satellite

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?c=JPArticle&cid=1195546795593&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull



Technorati -

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Sunday, November 25, 2007

(Arabs, Muslims Power Control & US foreign policy) Saudis have the US over a barrel of oil


Saudis have the US over a barrel of oil


By Ted Belman


In my article The Vast Power of the Saudi Lobby, which I urge you to read again. Here are a few extracts,
.. the U.S. ambassador to Riyahd, James Akins, did his best to placate King Faisal by urging the Saudi’s American-owned oil concessionaire ARAMCO to, in Akin’s words, “hammer home” to the White House that the embargo (seventies) wouldn’t be lifted unless
    “the political struggle is settled in manner satisfactory to Arabs.”

Prince Bandar told Bush
    Starting today, you go your way and we will go our way. From then on, the Saudis would look out for their own national interests.

It seemed the United States had made a strategic decision to adopt Sharon’s policy as American policy.

Within thirty-six hours, Bandar was on his way to Riyadh with a conciliatory response from Bush. When Bandar returned Powell cornered him.
    “What the fuck are you doing?” witnesses recall Powell asking. “You’re putting the fear of God in everybody’s hearts here. We’ve all come rushing here to hear this revelation that you bring from Saudi Arabia. You scared the shit out of everybody.”


As a result of this power, I wrote Whatever Saudis Want Saudis Get.

Is America over a barrel of oil? Definitely.

And what Saudis want is al Quds with the Temple Mount and the greenline and G-d knows what else.

Technorati -

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, November 21, 2007

More aggressive pro "Palestinian" US Foreign Policy

More aggressive pro "Palestinian" US Foreign Policy


http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/Flash.aspx/136649



U.S. Pushing Israel for Further 'Good Will' Moves

The Bush administration is putting pressure on the Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's government to go beyond freeing 500 Arab terrorists and prisoners and halting building permits in Judea and Samaria. It now wants Israel to freeze all building, including units under construction in areas covered by previous understandings to be included as part of Israel after final borders are decided for the proposed new Arab state.

American Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has put her reputation on the line by planning a conference on the Middle East to be held in Annapolis, Maryland. However, most Arab nations still have not confirmed that they will attend and are trying to squeeze more concessions from Israel.


In "light" of the current pro Palestinian US administration

1) Why do they still "accuse" the Zionist lobby?

2) How come Arabs still don't like us (isn't Israel the main issue/grievances supposedly?)

3) Where is Walt Mearsheimer and Jimmy Carter all of a sudden?


Technorati -




Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Monday, November 05, 2007

Are American Jews Too Powerful? Not Even Close.

From: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/02/AR2007110201659.html

Are American Jews Too Powerful? Not Even Close.

By Ruth Wisse
Sunday, November 4, 2007; Page B03

These days, it's becoming downright chic to hint forebodingly that America's Jews are just too powerful. But whether it's the political scientists John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt or former president Jimmy Carter, those who accuse modern Jews of having excessive clout are getting it precisely backward. In the real world, Jews have too little power and influence. They also have too little self-confidence about defending themselves.

Consider a basic paradox. Even anti-Semites often give Jews credit for having exceptional intelligence. Self-congratulatory Web sites reckon that Jews, who make up about 0.2 percent of the world's population, have been awarded more than 160 Nobel Prizes. But if Jews are so smart, why do 22 Arab League countries account for a tenth of the Earth's land surface while the Israelis struggle to secure a country that is 1/19th the size of California? If Jews are so powerful, why does Israel attract twice as many venture-capital investments as all of Europe, even while it's the only one of the United Nations' 192 member states that has been charged with racism for the crime of its existence? How powerful is that?

In fact, there's an excellent historical reason why Jewish intellectual achievement sits alongside political weakness. Simply put, Jewish achievement in other areas has come at the expense of political strength, and the strange relationship of Jews and power has made them history's favorite prey. Centuries of survival in other people's lands prevented Jews from achieving full acceptance -- and access to the levers of government. Some individual Jews may have lived large, but the Jewish people as a whole lived on sufferance, afraid to antagonize those from whom they sought tolerance.

These questions mean a lot to me. I'm often asked how I, a teacher of Yiddish literature, came to write about politics. But remember that the Yiddish language, developed by European Jews over almost a thousand years, was practically erased along with them in a mere six, 1939-45. So studying Yiddish literature, almost by definition, concentrates the mind on Jewish political disabilities.

When Jerusalem was crushed by Rome in the year 70 -- so brutally that, according to the historian Josephus, "no one visiting the spot would believe it had once been inhabited" -- some Jews stayed on, but the vast majority made their homes in foreign lands. For more than 18 centuries, Jews survived as a nation without three basic staples of nationhood: land, central government and independent means of self-defense.

Instead, Jews turned to strategies of accommodation. They provided goods and services to their gentile neighbors in return for being allowed to stay in the country. They became money-lenders, bankers, minters, craftsmen, midwives -- trades that gentiles would let them perform and that allowed Jews to observe their calendar, customs and religious laws. But they had no independent way to protect their achievements.


Unlike their Christian and Muslim overlords, Jews had good reasons to avoid irking those from whom they sought acceptance. The German poet Heinrich Heine, who called conversion to Christianity his "ticket of admission" to European culture, likened Jews to a prince whom "black magic" had transformed into a dog: "All week long he goes on scraping/Through life's excrement and sweepings/To the mockery of jeers of street boys." Only on Friday evenings, while ushering the Sabbath into his own home, does the dog resume its human shape. Heine saw that the humiliation of the Jews was offset by a moral serenity, and that their moral serenity was offset by acute political vulnerability.

The creation of the state of Israel in May 1948, after the carnage of the Holocaust, was supposed to change all this. But the newly formed Arab League made opposition to Israel the only common goal of its otherwise quarrelsome membership. The new United Nations, tribune of emerging post-colonial nations, did not protect Israel from assault, and over time the world body became a party to the Arab League's war against Jewish statehood.

Of course, Israel now had an army, and a formidable one at that. But the Israel Defense Forces did not change the Jews' existential condition as a minority; Israel was now a minority among the nations, contending with Arab states that sought to dominate or destroy it. Israel still lived by strategies of accommodation, trying to supply its neighborhood with useful services and goods such as medical, agricultural and technological know-how. In the 1990s, utopians such as Shimon Peres, now Israel's president, hailed a "new Middle East" of economic and political cooperation. When Peres and Israel's late prime minister Yitzhak Rabin installed Yasser Arafat as the head of a Palestinian proto-state, they began another doomed Jewish political experiment -- making Israel, as best I can figure, the first country in the world ever to arm its enemy in hopes of gaining security.

What about American Jewry? Mearsheimer and Walt allege that a Jewish cabal dictates U.S. policy in the Middle East, helping Israeli interests and hurting U.S. ones. So have American Jews really begun to mobilize effectively to protect Israel, or are people again overstating Jewish power and its supposed dangers?

Consider the halls of ivy where, if anywhere, the intellectual firepower of Jews might be expected to be on display in defense of Jewish interests. At Columbia University, the late Edward Said used his authority as a teacher of comparative literature to apologize for Palestinian terrorism and condone Arab violence against Israel, including, in one instance, by personal example. (In 2000, a photographer for a French news agency snapped him in southern Lebanon tossing a rock toward an Israeli position.) Much of the Jewish professoriat looked the other way or signed his petitions.

Elsewhere in the academy, Jewish professors themselves lead the anti-Israel barrage. In fact, Mearsheimer and Walt expected Jewish organizations to sponsor their talks and complained of "censorship" when the groups did not. Clearly, there is nothing quite as fun -- or as lucrative -- as baiting Jews.


Read rest of article at:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/02/AR2007110201659.html

Technorati -

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,