Islamic Republic of Iran's Mullahcracy plans to 'wipe out Israel in 9 minutes' - calls to kill jall Jews - Israel Vs. Genocide IVG
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
Iran lays out legal case for genocidal attack against 'cancerous tumor'
Published: 2 days ago
By Reza Kahlili
The Iranian government, through a website proxy, has laid out the legal and religious justification for the destruction of Israel and the slaughter of its people.
The doctrine includes wiping out Israeli assets and Jewish people worldwide.
http://www.wnd.com/2012/02/ayatollah-kill-all-jews-annihilate-israel/Iranian Parliament's Website: Attack Israel this Year
Majlis says area between Lod and Jerusalem, Tel Nof Air Base should be targeted. Iranian blog: 9 minutes are enough to finish Israel.
By Gil Ronen
First Publish: 2/5/2012, 6:56 PM
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/152437Iran: Genocide a Moral Obligation
An article calling for the destruction of Israel and genocide has appeared on numerous official government and military websites in Iran
By Gavriel Queenann
First Publish: 2/6/2012, 11:04 PM
Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on Monday endorsed a new doctrine explaining why it would be 'legally and morally justified' to commit genocide and wipe Israel off the map.
The article was written by Khameini's close adviser Alireza Forghani and endorsed by the Supreme Leader whose writings played a critical role in its drafting.
The article has since appeared on numerous Iranian government and military websites.
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/152478Iran's Ayatollah: 'Kill all Jews and annihilate Israel!' Iran's Ayatollah lays out legal and religious justification for attack Doctrine says Israel would be wiped out in 9 minutes
By Lee Moran
Last updated at 3:52 PM on 6th February 2012
A website with close ties to Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has outlined why it would be acceptable to kill all Jews and ...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2097252/Kill-Jews-annihilate-Israel-
Irans-supreme-leader-lays-legal-religious-justification-attack.html
Tags: Genocide, infidels, Iran, Iran's nuclear program, Iranian threat, Islamofascism, Israel, Israel vs genocide, IVG, Jews, Jihad, Khamenei, Mullahcracy, Muslims, non Muslims, nuclear program, Nukes
Labels: Iran, Israel vs genocide, IVG, Nukes
Gordon Brown to condemn Iran’s president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad Gordon Brown will pledge “unbreakable” support for Israel
Gordon Brown to condemn Iran’s president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad Gordon Brown will pledge “unbreakable” support to Israel while launching his strongest attack yet on Iran. The Prime Minister will send a tough message to the Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Monday, warning of imminent sanctions on oil and gas if he does not abandon his nuclear ambitions. In a landmark speech to the Israeli parliament, Mr Brown will say that Mr Ahmadinejad’s denial of Israel’s right to exist is “totally abhorrent”.
The European Union has already said it stands ready to push for a block on foreign investment in new Iranian oil and gas projects along with sanctions on the financial sector if the Gulf state does not comply with requests to suspend its uranium enrichment programme. British officials hinted that sanctions could extend to all parts of the oil industry in a bid to disrupt production by Iran, which exports some 2.5 million barrels a day. In his speech to the Knesset, the first by a British Prime Minister, Mr Brown will voice determination to prevent an Iranian nuclear programme. He will say that Iran now has a clear choice to make: “Suspend its nuclear programme and accept our offer of negotiations or face growing isolation and the collective response not of one nation but of many nations.”
Mr Brown will tell Israel that it has Britain’s unequivocal support: “Britain is your true friend. A friend in difficult times as well as in good times, a friend who will stand beside you whenever your peace, your stability and your existence are under threat; a friend who shares an unbreakable partnership based on shared values of liberty, democracy and justice. “Britain and Israel continue to stand together. So to those who question Israel’s right to exist and
(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk …
Tags: Genocide, Gordon Brown, Iran, Islamic nukes, Islamofascism, Israel, Nukes, UK
Labels: Genocide, Gordon Brown, Iran, Islamic nukes, Islamofascism, Israel, Nukes, UK
News, Editorials] Updates on the radical ISLAMIC REPUBLIC of IRAN'S NUKES DANGERM
[News, Editorials] Updates on the radical ISLAMIC REPUBLIC of IRAN'S NUKES DANGERM
NIE: "Our assessment that the program probably was halted primarily in response to international pressure suggests Iran may be more vulnerable to influence..."
The new estimate is sure to have considerable political impact. Before deciding on what the NIE means for policy, one should first be sure what it says. The reality is that the estimate says little about whether Iran still aims to produce nuclear weapons or when it might do so. The NIE's information supports the theory that Iran has simply changed the sequencing of its nuclear weapons effort -- not necessarily the theory that Iran is no longer pursuing nuclear weapons.
http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/templateC05.php?CID=2689
Bush softens tone but insists Iran is dangerous
"Iran was dangerous. Iran is dangerous. And Iran will be dangerous if they have the knowledge necessary to make a nuclear weapon," he said, emphasising that ...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/12/04/wiran204.xml
Rice says easing of pressure on Iran a "big mistake" [Reuters]
US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said on Tuesday it would be a "big mistake" to ease world pressure on Iran ...
http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSN0454283520071204
Bush insists Iran poses danger, despite report
AFP
WASHINGTON (AFP) — The United States refused to rule out a military attack on Iran and vowed to step up pressure on Tehran, despite a surprise US ...
http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5i7iyoBcxg7oQU0mmoayWHnO5aWXg
US: Iran Still Able to Develop Nukes
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5iRqjZV1Meppj40hTs8IBOv4DdsQwD8TA7RN81
Hadley: US Policy Toward Iran Nuclear Weapons Must Continue
FOX News - Dec 3, 2007
It also concludes that Iran's decision to halt the program is likely based on a cost-benefit approach, influenced by international pressure...
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,314782,00.html
Tehran defiant on nuclear enrichment
Reuters, The Associated Press, The New York TimesPublished: December 2, 2007
TEHRAN: Further UN sanctions will not solve the dispute with the West over Iran's nuclear plans, the Iranian Foreign Ministry said Sunday, a day after six world powers discussed imposing new penalties on Tehran.
http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/12/02/africa/iran.php
Islamofascism Iran Nukes Bush Israel Intelligence Islamic Nukes Foreign policy Muslims
Labels: Iran, Islamic nukes, Nukes
Hitting [Islamic Hitler: Ahmadinejad of] Iran Where It Hurts
Hitting Iran Where It Hurts
Tough new U.S. economic sanctions raise tensions with Iran—and talk of war
By Thomas Omestad
Posted October 25, 2007
In an aggressive move to ratchet up pressure on Iran, the Bush administration today announced the toughest sanctions to date on Iran for its nuclear programs and for what U.S. officials say is crucial support of anti-U.S. militants operating in Iraq. The primary targets of the new sanctions are the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps, its Quds Force foreign-operations unit, and the Iranian Defense Ministry itself.
http://www.usnews.com/articles/news/world/2007/10/25/hitting-iran-where-it-hurts.html Technorati - Freedom 911 Al Qaida Al Qaeda Al Qaida Bin Laden Islamofascism Islam Apes and pigs Terrorism Terrorist oganization Hamas 'palestinians' Al Aqsa Alaqsa Muslims Christians Jews Arabs bombing Infidels Israel US Security Iraq Iran Jihad Mosque West Labels: Ahmadinejad, Iran, Islamic danger, Islamic Hitler, Islamic Repulic, Islamofascism, Muslims, Nukes, sancions, US
How can we prevent Iran from attacking Israel with a nuclear bomb? (Hint: Appeasement is not the answer.)
How can we prevent Iran from attacking Israel with a nuclear bomb? (Hint: Appeasement is not the answer.)
Dear Friend of FLAME
http://factsandlogic.com (hat tp to
beshep33@aol.com) :
Iran’s president Mohammed Achmadinejad has called for the absolute destruction of Israel. Many international legal scholars argue that this is tantamount to a declaration of war and alone would justify Israel’s preemptively responding now. This existential threat to Israel is raised to red alert, of course, because Iran is simultaneously racing to acquire nuclear weapons. If you combine Iran’s stated intention to wipe Israel off the map with the means by which it could execute, pretty much any preemptive response from Israel would seem justified.
But can this threat be mitigated through diplomacy? That seems to be what a lot of politicians, including many in Israel, are hoping for. Diplomacy is a curious weapon, though. It’s not just words. It’s words backed by the capability of action---plus a serious determination to take action---if words alone don’t work. Put another way, in order for the world to convince Iran to back off its nuclear intentions, Iran has to be convinced that it would not be successful in destroying Israel, no matter what, and that it would lose---big time---in any confrontation with Israel.
The question is, does Israel currently have the military capability to deter a nuclear Iran? Does Israel have the muscle to make diplomacy meaningful? In the article below, Professor Louis Rene Beres and Lt. General Thomas McInerney indicate that Israel does not yet have an ironclad defense against Iran.
All the more reason that as foreign aid funding comes up in U.S. Congress over the coming months---including about $2.8 billion in military aid for Israel---that we and our elected representatives continue to support Israel. Let’s make sure they remember that Israel is the best friend and the cheapest insurance policy the U.S. has in the Middle East.
As you review this article, I believe you’ll see why Israel and the U.S. need to continue to take a tough stand against Iran’s nuclear ambitions and back it with “a big stick.”
Best regards,
Jim Sinkinson
Director, FLAME
P.S. I hope you agree that the U.S. and the rest of the world should take a unyielding stand against Iran acquiring nuclear weapons and that the U.S. should continue to assist Israel to maintain a strong military deterrent to terrorist states like Iran (and Syria, for that matter). To those who oppose U.S. military aid to Israel, FLAME has published a position paper on “Israel and the United States: Is Israel an asset or a burden to our country?.” (To read and print out this powerful message---which was distributed to media with a circulation of more than 5 million people---please go to http://www.factsandlogic.org/ad_99.html.) It’s our fear for Israel’s survival and our passionate belief that the U.S. must continue to support her that keeps us motivated at FLAME. If you share our concern---and if you agree that FLAME’s efforts on Israel’s behalf make a difference---I hope you’ll help us keep the flame alive. Your contribution of $100 or $200 or $500---or whatever you can afford (and no gift is too small)---will contribute importantly to sending out messages like these. I hope you’ll do so now by going to our online donation page right now at http://www.factsandlogic.org/make_a_donation.html. Thanks so much for your continued support.
----------
Preemption option: a must for Israelby Louis Rene Beres and Thomas McInerney, February 27, Christian Science Monitor
Its missile defense system is not enough to defend against a nuclear or biological attack from Iran or other aggressors.
The core of Israel's active defense plan remains the Arrow antiballistic missile program. Test results of the Arrow have been promising. They indicate not only the mutual benefits of close cooperation between Washington and Jerusalem, but also the technical promise of Israel's missile defense system.
But serious decisions must still be made. Faced with a steadily nuclearizing Iran, Israel must consider whether it can rely entirely upon a suitable combination of deterrence and active defenses or whether it must also prepare for preemption. The results of this essential consideration will have existential consequences for the Jewish state.
Israel's preemption option should now appear less urgent. If the Arrow were truly efficient, even an irrational Iranian adversary armed with nuclear and/or biological weapons could be dealt with effectively. If Israel's nuclear deterrent were immobilized by an enemy state willing to risk a massive "counter-value" Israeli reprisal, that aggressor's ensuing first strike could still be blocked by Arrow. So why even consider preemption against Iran?
Missile defense is no guarantee.The answer lies in certain crucial assumptions. "Operational reliability of intercept" is a "soft" concept, and any missile defense system will always have "leakage" – it can't stop every incoming missile. Whether such leakage would fall within acceptable levels must ultimately depend, primarily, upon the kinds of warheads fitted upon the enemy's incoming missiles. Shall Israel now bet its very life on a capacity to fully anticipate offensive enemy capabilities? We think not.
A tiny number of enemy missiles penetrating Arrow defenses could still be "acceptable" if their warheads contained only conventional high explosive or even chemical high explosive. But if the incoming warheads were nuclear and/or biological, even an extremely low rate of leakage would be intolerable. This means that Israel cannot depend upon its antiballistic missiles to defend against any future attack by Iran using a weapon of mass destruction. Even if Israel could expect a 100 percent reliability of interception for Arrow, this would do nothing to blunt the unconventional threat from terrorist surrogates. Special points of vulnerability for Israel would be Lebanon, with Hizbullah proxies acting for Iran, and Gaza, where Iran-supported Hamas is also developing dangerous ties with Al Qaeda.
Preemption and deterrenceIsrael still faces certain state enemies whose undisguised preparations for attacking the Jewish state are genocidal, and who may not always be rational. Israel has every right to act preemptively when facing an existential assault. Known as "anticipatory self-defense," this general right is affirmed in both codified and customary international law, including the 1996 Advisory Opinion issued by the International Court of Justice.
Israel must continue to develop, test, and implement a missile interception capability. It must also prepare for certain possible preemptions, and enhance the credibility of its nuclear deterrent. Israel must operationalize a recognizable second-strike force, sufficiently hardened and dispersed, and ready to inflict a decisive retaliatory salvo against enemy cities.
Arrow is necessary for Israeli security, but it is not sufficient. To achieve a maximum level of security, Israel must also take appropriate and coordinated preparations for preemption and deterrence. Ballistic missile defense will do nothing to thwart terrorist surrogates of Iran who could utilize ordinary ships, cars, or trucks as nuclear-weapon delivery vehicles.
Left alone in its nuclear plan, Iran would probably share certain of its atomic munitions with assorted anti-Israeli proxies in Lebanon, Syria, Gaza, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and Iraq. Ballistic missile defense is indispensable for Israel, but it is also critical for both Jerusalem and Washington that Iran's nuclear infrastructures be destroyed at their source.
Labels: Ahmadinejad, anti Israel bigotry, Iran, Islamic bomb, Islamic Hitler, Islamofascism, Israel, Nukes
