Monday, April 20, 2009


Boo to the Muslim Hitler - Ahmadinejad Jeered at the racist “anti-racism” conf. UN Durban


Ahmadinejad jeered at anti-racism conference - CNN.com, The opening of a United Nations conference in Switzerland on anti-racism was marred by chaotic scenes Monday as protests and a walkout by delegates … http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/europe/04/20/racism.conference/index.html


Iran’s leader sparks Western walkout at UN meeting, AP – Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad gestures during his speech at the …. JOE BEE buzzed up: Iran’s leader sparks Western walkout at UN meeting (AP) … http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090420/ap_on_re_eu/un_un_racism_conference


Iran’s leader sparks walkout, shouts of ’shame’ - United Nations …Apr 20, 2009 … Image: Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad delivers his speech … Iran’s leader sparks walkout at U.N. meeting … http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30304767/


European delegates walk out on Iran’s President Mahmoud ...Apr 20, 2009 ... The United States and eight other Western countries, ... That prompted a walkout by some 40 diplomats from European countries such as Britain and ... Ahmadinejad "has made Iran the odd man out," Jonas Gahr Store said. ...


 

 Delegates walk out of UN summit during Ahmadinejad speech ... While 40 diplomats representing Britain, France and other European countries...


 

 Boycott, Walkout Mar UN Racism Conference - Radio Free Europe ...Apr 20, 2009 ... Delegations from a number of countries have walked out of a UN ... Some 40 delegates stood and exited the hall amid a mixture of outraged shouts ... EU Walkout Ahmadinejad's invitation to address the conference... http://www.rferl.org/content/Western_Boycott_Mars_UN_Racism_Conference_From_Outset/1612128.html

 

 Apr 20, 2009 ... Delegates walk out of UN summit during Ahmadinejad speech ... While 40 diplomats representing Britain, France and other European countries left later, Ahmadinejad was applauded by some Middle Eastern...


 





Labels: , , , ,

Sunday, February 22, 2009

Germany tells Islamic Hitler Ahmadinejad (in Iran): the Holocaust is a historical fact & its unparalleled crime on the 6,000,000 Jews

Germany tells Islamic Hitler Ahmadinejad (in Iran): the Holocaust is a historical fact & its unparalleled crime on the 6,000,000 Jews



Ex-German chancellor, in Iran, says “Holocaust a fact”

Feb 21, 2009

TEHRAN, Feb 21 (Reuters) - Visiting former German chancellor Gerhard Schroeder criticised on Saturday Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad for casting doubt over the Holocaust, saying the slaughter of 6 million Jews by Nazis was a fact.

Since coming to power in 2005, Ahmadinejad has provoked international condemnation for saying the Holocaust was a “myth” and calling Israel a “tumour” in the Middle East.

“The Holocaust is a historic fact and there is no sense in denying this unparalleled crime,” Schroeder told the Iranian Chamber of Industry and Commerce.

“Iran needs to take responsibility and respect international rules, if it wants to be taken seriously as a regional power.”

Schroeder, due to meet Ahmadinejad in Tehran later on Saturday, also criticised the hardline leader for his views on Israel which Iran has refused to recognise since its 1979 Islamic revolution.

http://www.reuters.com/article/latestCrisis/idUSHAF142289


Germany’s ex-chancellor asks Iranians to recognise Holocaust Hanover (Germany), Feb 21 (DPA) On a visit to Iran, former German chancellor Gerhard Schroeder was set to criticise Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s denial that the Holocaust happened, a German newspaper said Friday.

http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/politics/germanys-ex-chancellor-asks-iranians-to-recognise-holocaust_100157817.html



More on Islamic Hitler: Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/173597.php






Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, June 24, 2008

What (Islamic Hitler: Mahnoud) Ahmadanijad REALLY says about Israel

What Ahmadanijad REALLY says about Israel
Ahmadinejad Was Not Mistranslated
What Iranian Leaders Really Say about Doing Away with Israel: A Refutation of the Campaign to Excuse Ahmadinejad’s Incitement to Genocide
http://www.jcpa.org/text/ahmadinejad2-words.pdf

Ahmadinejad Was Not Mistranslated
By Joshua Teitelbaum

• Over the past several years, Iranian leaders – most prominently, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad – have made numerous statements calling for the destruction of Israel and the Jewish people. While certain experts have interpreted these statements to be simple expressions of dissatisfaction with the current Israeli government and its policies, in reality, the intent behind Ahmadinejad’s language and that of others is clear.
• What emerges from a comprehensive analysis of what Ahmadinejad actually said – and how it has been interpreted in Iran – is that the Iranian president was not just calling for “regime change” in Jerusalem, but rather the actual physical destruction of the State of Israel. When Ahmadinejad punctuates his speech with “Death to Israel” (marg bar Esraiil), this is no longer open to various interpretations.
• A common motif of genocide incitement is the dehumanization of the target population. The Nazi weekly Der Stürmer portrayed Jews as parasites and locusts. Ahmadinejad said in a speech on October 26, 2005: “In the Middle East, they [the global powers] have created a black and filthy microbe called the Zionist regime.”
• Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who succeeded Ayatollah Khomeini in 1989, has made statements about Israel similar to Ahmadinejad. On December 15, 2000, he declared on Iranian TV: “Iran’s position, which was first expressed by the Imam [Khomeini] and stated several times by those responsible, is that the cancerous tumor called Israel must be uprooted from the region.”
• Michael Axworthy, who served as the Head of the Iran Section of Britain’s Foreign and Commonwealth Office, notes that when the slogan “Israel must be wiped off the map” appeared “draped over missiles in military parades, that meaning was pretty clear.”
• There is an ample legal basis for the prosecution of Ahmadinejad in the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court for direct and public incitement to commit genocide and crimes against humanity.

Technorati -

Labels: , , , ,

Thursday, October 25, 2007

Hitting [Islamic Hitler: Ahmadinejad of] Iran Where It Hurts

Hitting Iran Where It Hurts
Tough new U.S. economic sanctions raise tensions with Iran—and talk of war

By Thomas Omestad
Posted October 25, 2007


In an aggressive move to ratchet up pressure on Iran, the Bush administration today announced the toughest sanctions to date on Iran for its nuclear programs and for what U.S. officials say is crucial support of anti-U.S. militants operating in Iraq. The primary targets of the new sanctions are the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps, its Quds Force foreign-operations unit, and the Iranian Defense Ministry itself.

http://www.usnews.com/articles/news/world/2007/10/25/hitting-iran-where-it-hurts.html

Technorati -

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, March 13, 2007

Islamofascists Mullah regime calls its Buenos Aires bombing a Jewish conspiracy

Mullah regime calls its Buenos Aires bombing a Jewish conspiracy
http://www.judeoscope.ca/breve.php3?id_breve=3299 ^ Mar 10, 2007Mullah regime calls its Buenos Aires bombing a Jewish conspiracyJudeoscope.ca, Canada - Mar 10, 2007

Tehran’s Islamofascists cowardly impute their horrific bombing of Buenos Aires Jewish community centre to Jews... Iran’s charge d’affaires in Buenos Aires.


Blaming the victim?

That's actually very Islamic, as in rape - blaming the woman. Just like 9/11, Islamists are comitting the crime & blaming their very victims.

Technorati - ]

Labels: , , , , , ,

Friday, March 02, 2007

How can we prevent Iran from attacking Israel with a nuclear bomb? (Hint: Appeasement is not the answer.)

How can we prevent Iran from attacking Israel with a nuclear bomb? (Hint: Appeasement is not the answer.)
Dear Friend of FLAME http://factsandlogic.com (hat tp to beshep33@aol.com) :

Iran’s president Mohammed Achmadinejad has called for the absolute destruction of Israel. Many international legal scholars argue that this is tantamount to a declaration of war and alone would justify Israel’s preemptively responding now. This existential threat to Israel is raised to red alert, of course, because Iran is simultaneously racing to acquire nuclear weapons. If you combine Iran’s stated intention to wipe Israel off the map with the means by which it could execute, pretty much any preemptive response from Israel would seem justified.

But can this threat be mitigated through diplomacy? That seems to be what a lot of politicians, including many in Israel, are hoping for. Diplomacy is a curious weapon, though. It’s not just words. It’s words backed by the capability of action---plus a serious determination to take action---if words alone don’t work. Put another way, in order for the world to convince Iran to back off its nuclear intentions, Iran has to be convinced that it would not be successful in destroying Israel, no matter what, and that it would lose---big time---in any confrontation with Israel.

The question is, does Israel currently have the military capability to deter a nuclear Iran? Does Israel have the muscle to make diplomacy meaningful? In the article below, Professor Louis Rene Beres and Lt. General Thomas McInerney indicate that Israel does not yet have an ironclad defense against Iran.

All the more reason that as foreign aid funding comes up in U.S. Congress over the coming months---including about $2.8 billion in military aid for Israel---that we and our elected representatives continue to support Israel. Let’s make sure they remember that Israel is the best friend and the cheapest insurance policy the U.S. has in the Middle East.

As you review this article, I believe you’ll see why Israel and the U.S. need to continue to take a tough stand against Iran’s nuclear ambitions and back it with “a big stick.”

Best regards,

Jim Sinkinson
Director, FLAME

P.S. I hope you agree that the U.S. and the rest of the world should take a unyielding stand against Iran acquiring nuclear weapons and that the U.S. should continue to assist Israel to maintain a strong military deterrent to terrorist states like Iran (and Syria, for that matter). To those who oppose U.S. military aid to Israel, FLAME has published a position paper on “Israel and the United States: Is Israel an asset or a burden to our country?.” (To read and print out this powerful message---which was distributed to media with a circulation of more than 5 million people---please go to http://www.factsandlogic.org/ad_99.html.) It’s our fear for Israel’s survival and our passionate belief that the U.S. must continue to support her that keeps us motivated at FLAME. If you share our concern---and if you agree that FLAME’s efforts on Israel’s behalf make a difference---I hope you’ll help us keep the flame alive. Your contribution of $100 or $200 or $500---or whatever you can afford (and no gift is too small)---will contribute importantly to sending out messages like these. I hope you’ll do so now by going to our online donation page right now at http://www.factsandlogic.org/make_a_donation.html. Thanks so much for your continued support.

----------

Preemption option: a must for Israel
by Louis Rene Beres and Thomas McInerney, February 27, Christian Science Monitor

Its missile defense system is not enough to defend against a nuclear or biological attack from Iran or other aggressors.

The core of Israel's active defense plan remains the Arrow antiballistic missile program. Test results of the Arrow have been promising. They indicate not only the mutual benefits of close cooperation between Washington and Jerusalem, but also the technical promise of Israel's missile defense system.

But serious decisions must still be made. Faced with a steadily nuclearizing Iran, Israel must consider whether it can rely entirely upon a suitable combination of deterrence and active defenses or whether it must also prepare for preemption. The results of this essential consideration will have existential consequences for the Jewish state.

Israel's preemption option should now appear less urgent. If the Arrow were truly efficient, even an irrational Iranian adversary armed with nuclear and/or biological weapons could be dealt with effectively. If Israel's nuclear deterrent were immobilized by an enemy state willing to risk a massive "counter-value" Israeli reprisal, that aggressor's ensuing first strike could still be blocked by Arrow. So why even consider preemption against Iran?

Missile defense is no guarantee.

The answer lies in certain crucial assumptions. "Operational reliability of intercept" is a "soft" concept, and any missile defense system will always have "leakage" – it can't stop every incoming missile. Whether such leakage would fall within acceptable levels must ultimately depend, primarily, upon the kinds of warheads fitted upon the enemy's incoming missiles. Shall Israel now bet its very life on a capacity to fully anticipate offensive enemy capabilities? We think not.

A tiny number of enemy missiles penetrating Arrow defenses could still be "acceptable" if their warheads contained only conventional high explosive or even chemical high explosive. But if the incoming warheads were nuclear and/or biological, even an extremely low rate of leakage would be intolerable. This means that Israel cannot depend upon its antiballistic missiles to defend against any future attack by Iran using a weapon of mass destruction. Even if Israel could expect a 100 percent reliability of interception for Arrow, this would do nothing to blunt the unconventional threat from terrorist surrogates. Special points of vulnerability for Israel would be Lebanon, with Hizbullah proxies acting for Iran, and Gaza, where Iran-supported Hamas is also developing dangerous ties with Al Qaeda.

Preemption and deterrence

Israel still faces certain state enemies whose undisguised preparations for attacking the Jewish state are genocidal, and who may not always be rational. Israel has every right to act preemptively when facing an existential assault. Known as "anticipatory self-defense," this general right is affirmed in both codified and customary international law, including the 1996 Advisory Opinion issued by the International Court of Justice.

Israel must continue to develop, test, and implement a missile interception capability. It must also prepare for certain possible preemptions, and enhance the credibility of its nuclear deterrent. Israel must operationalize a recognizable second-strike force, sufficiently hardened and dispersed, and ready to inflict a decisive retaliatory salvo against enemy cities.

Arrow is necessary for Israeli security, but it is not sufficient. To achieve a maximum level of security, Israel must also take appropriate and coordinated preparations for preemption and deterrence. Ballistic missile defense will do nothing to thwart terrorist surrogates of Iran who could utilize ordinary ships, cars, or trucks as nuclear-weapon delivery vehicles.

Left alone in its nuclear plan, Iran would probably share certain of its atomic munitions with assorted anti-Israeli proxies in Lebanon, Syria, Gaza, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and Iraq. Ballistic missile defense is indispensable for Israel, but it is also critical for both Jerusalem and Washington that Iran's nuclear infrastructures be destroyed at their source.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Sunday, February 25, 2007

Iran's sputnik [no negotiations w/ fanatical Mullahs bend on world domination!]

Iran's sputnik [no negotiations w/ fanatical Mullahs bend on world domination!]

http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0226/p08s02-comv.html

CS Monitor

02/25/2007 Iran's sputnik Christian Science Monitor - Its space launch shows Tehran wants to be a global military player - one more reason for UN sanctions. Negotiating isn't always done in words.

Labels: , , , ,

3 Arab states in gulf say would help Israel attack Iran

3 Arab states in gulf say would help Israel attack Iran

3 Arab states in gulf say would allow Israel to enter airspace to attack Iran

February 25, 2007

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/objects/pages/ShowTickers.jhtml

Labels: , , , , ,

Thursday, September 21, 2006

Islamic Hitler raises eyebrows, Ahmadinejad: I’m not anti-Semitic...

Ahmadinejad: I’m not anti-Semitic

YNet ^ Sept. 21, 2006 Yitzhak Benhorin
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3306947,00.html



He is "not" antisemitic, he just wants to wipe off all Israeli JEWS.

He is "not" antisemitic he just "questions" the holocaust of the innocent 6,000,000 murdered for the sole cause of antisemitism.

He is "not" antisemitic he just held a conference on the "World without Zionism", oh, what? Zionists are Jews? I didn't know that, I swear to Muhammad.

What on earth is the matter with the entire dumb world?

Labels: , , , , , ,